that a particular variant will appear benign by these criteria and still be disease causing in humans because of a prolonged human life span, environmental triggers, or compensatory genes present in the model organism but not in humans.根据这些标准看似良性的特定变异,由于人类寿命延长、环境触发因素或模式生物中存在但人类缺乏的代偿基因,仍可能在人类中导致疾病。
Conversely, functional effects demonstrated in systems that do not fully represent the human biologic state may falsely implicate a variant as pathogenic.相反,在未完全代表人类生物学状态的系统中展示的功能效应,可能错误地将某种变异归为致病性。
Caution must be exercised to ensure adequate validation of these assays with variants determined to be pathogenic or benign through other types of evidence.必须谨慎行事,确保这些检测方法已通过其他类型证据确定为致病性或良性的变异得到充分验证。
Segregation data—If a particular variant is coinherited with a disease in one or more families or, conversely, does not track with a disease in the family under investigation, then it is more or less likely to be pathogenic.分离数据——如果某一特定变异在一个或多个家族中与疾病共同遗传,或者反过来,在所研究的家族中不与疾病共分离,那么它更可能或更不可能具有致病性。
Of course, when only a few individuals are affected, the variant and disease may appear to track by random chance; to be considered strong evidence for pathogenicity, the number of times a variant and disease must be coinherited is generally accepted to be in at least five informative meioses.当然,当只有少数个体受累时,变异和疾病可能看起来是随机共存的;要作为致病性的强证据,一般认为变异与疾病必须至少在有信息的五次减数分裂中共同遗传。
Finding affected individuals in the family who do not carry the variant would be strong evidence against the variant being pathogenic, but finding unaffected individuals who do carry the variant is less persuasive if the disorder is known to have reduced penetrance.在家族中发现未携带该变异的患病个体,将是反对该变异致病性的强证据;但如果已知该疾病具有外显率降低,则发现携带该变异的未患病个体说服力较弱。
De novo variant—The appearance of a severe disorder in a child along with a new variant in a coding exon that neither parent carries (de novo variant) is additional evidence for that variant to be pathogenic.新生变异——儿童出现严重疾病,同时其编码外显子中出现父母双方均不携带的新变异(新生变异),是该变异具有致病性的额外证据。
However, between one and two new changes occur in the coding regions of genes in every child (see earlier).然而,每个儿童的基因编码区会发生一到两次新的变化(见前述内容)。
Only de novo variants in genes that are associated with the individual’s phenotype are considered evidence for pathogenicity, given a lower prior probability of de novo mutation for a small, targeted set of genes.鉴于针对较小靶向基因集的新生突变先验概率较低,仅当新生变异出现在与个体表型相关的基因中时,才被视为致病性证据。
Variant characterization—A variant may be synonymous, missense, nonsense, a frameshift with a premature termination downstream, or cause a highly conserved splice site change.变异特征描述——变异可为同义、错义、无义、导致下游提前终止的移码,或引起高度保守剪接位点改变。
The impact on the function of the gene can be inferred but, once again, is not definitive.可推断其对基因功能的影响,但再次强调,这并非决定性。
For example, a synonymous change that does not alter an amino acid codon might be thought to be benign but may have deleterious effects on normal splicing and be pathogenic (see examples in Chapter 12).例如,不改变氨基酸密码子的同义改变可能被认为良性,但可能对正常剪接产生有害影响而具有致病性(见第12章中的例子)。
Conversely, one might assume that premature termination or frameshift variants are always deleterious and disease causing; however, such an alteration at the far 3′ end of a gene may produce a truncated protein that is still functional and, therefore, be a benign change.相反,人们可能认为提前终止或移码变异总是有害且致病;然而,位于基因远3'端的此类改变可能产生仍有功能的截短蛋白,因此为良性改变。
Prior occurrence—Having been seen multiple times among collections of patients with a similar disorder is important additional evidence that a variant is pathogenic.既往出现——在患有类似疾病的患者集合中多次被观察到,是变异致病性的重要额外证据。
Even if a missense variant is novel (i. e., never described before) it is more likely to be pathogenic if it occurs at the same position in the protein as other known pathogenic missense variants.即使某个错义变异是新型的(即从未描述过),如果它出现在与其他已知致病性错义变异相同的蛋白位置上,则更可能具有致病性。
ACKNOWLEDGMENT We thank Miriam Reuter, Heidi Rehm and Jeff Mac Donald for contributing to this chapter.致谢:我们感谢Miriam Reuter、Heidi Rehm和Jeff Mac Donald对本章的贡献。
GENERAL REFERENCES Olson MV: Human genetic individuality, Ann Rev Genomics Hum Genet 13:1–27, 2012.一般参考文献:Olson MV: Human genetic individuality, Ann Rev Genomics Hum Genet 13:1–27, 2012.
Strachan T, Read A, editors: Human molecular genetics ed 5, New York, 2018, Garland Science.Strachan T, Read A, editors: Human molecular genetics ed 5, New York, 2018, Garland Science.
The 1000 Genomes Project Consortium: An integrated map of genetic variation from 1,092 human genomes, Nature 491:56–65, 2012.The 1000 Genomes Project Consortium: An integrated map of genetic variation from 1,092 human genomes, Nature 491:56–65, 2012.
Trost B, Loureiro LO, Scherer SW: Discovery of genomic variation across a generation, Human Molecular Genetics, Volume 30, Issue R2, 15 October 2021, Pages R174–R186, org/10. 1093/hmg/ddab 209.Trost B, Loureiro LO, Scherer SW: Discovery of genomic variation across a generation, Human Molecular Genetics, Volume 30, Issue R2, 15 October 2021, Pages R174–R186, org/10.1093/hmg/ddab209.
Willard HF: The human genome: a window on human genetics, biology and medicine.Willard HF: The human genome: a window on human genetics, biology and medicine.
In Ginsburg GS, Willard HF, editors: Genomic and personalized medicine ed 3, New York, 2016, Elsevier.In Ginsburg GS, Willard HF, editors: Genomic and personalized medicine ed 3, New York, 2016, Elsevier.
REFERENCES FOR SPECIFIC TOPICS Alkan C, Coe BP, Eichler EE: Genome structural variation discovery and genotyping, Nature Rev Genet 12:363–376, 2011.特定主题参考文献:Alkan C, Coe BP, Eichler EE: Genome structural variation discovery and genotyping, Nature Rev Genet 12:363–376, 2011.
Bagnall RD, Waseem N, Green PM, et al: Recurrent inversion breaking intron 1 of the factor VIII gene is a frequent cause of severe hemophilia A, Blood 99:168–174, 2002.Bagnall RD, Waseem N, Green PM, et al: Recurrent inversion breaking intron 1 of the factor VIII gene is a frequent cause of severe hemophilia A, Blood 99:168–174, 2002.
Crow JF: The origins, patterns and implications of human spontaneous mutation, Nature Rev Genet 1:40–47, 2000.Crow JF: The origins, patterns and implications of human spontaneous mutation, Nature Rev Genet 1:40–47, 2000.
Fan S, Kelley DE, Beltrame MH, et al: African evolutionary history inferred from whole genome sequence data of 44 indigenous African populations, Genome Biol 20:82, 2019.Fan S, Kelley DE, Beltrame MH, et al: African evolutionary history inferred from whole genome sequence data of 44 indigenous African populations, Genome Biol 20:82, 2019.
Gardner RJ: A new estimate of the achondroplasia mutation rate, Clin Genet 11:31–38, 1977.Gardner RJ: A new estimate of the achondroplasia mutation rate, Clin Genet 11:31–38, 1977.
Karczewski KJ, Francioli LC, Tiao G, et al: The mutational constraint spectrum quantified from variation in 141,456 humans, Nature 581:434–443, 2020. 41586-020-2308-7 Kong A, Frigge ML, Masson G, et al: Rate of de novo mutations and the importance of father’s age to disease risk, Nature 488:471–475, 2012.Karczewski KJ, Francioli LC, Tiao G, et al: The mutational constraint spectrum quantified from variation in 141,456 humans, Nature 581:434–443, 2020. 41586-020-2308-7 Kong A, Frigge ML, Masson G, et al: Rate of de novo mutations and the importance of father’s age to disease risk, Nature 488:471–475, 2012.
Lappalainen T, Sammeth M, Friedlander MR, et al: Transcriptome and genome sequencing uncovers functional variation in humans, Nature 501:506–511, 2013.Lappalainen T, Sammeth M, Friedlander MR, et al: Transcriptome and genome sequencing uncovers functional variation in humans, Nature 501:506–511, 2013.
Mac Arthur DG, Balasubramanian S, Rrankish A, et al: A systematic survey of loss-of-function variants in human protein-coding genes, Science 335:823–828, 2012.Mac Arthur DG, Balasubramanian S, Rrankish A, et al: A systematic survey of loss-of-function variants in human protein-coding genes, Science 335:823–828, 2012.
Mc Bride CM, Wade CH, Kaphingst KA: Consumers’ view of direct- to-consumer genetic information, Ann Rev Genomics Hum Genet 11:427–446, 2010.Mc Bride CM, Wade CH, Kaphingst KA: Consumers’ view of direct-to-consumer genetic information, Ann Rev Genomics Hum Genet 11:427–446, 2010.
Richards S, Aziz N, Bale S, et al: Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology, Genet Med 17(5):405–424, 2015.Richards S, Aziz N, Bale S, et al: Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology, Genet Med 17(5):405–424, 2015.
Stewart C, Kural D, Stromberg MP, et al: A comprehensive map of mobile element insertion polymorphisms in humans, PLo S Genet 7:e 1002236, 2011.Stewart C, Kural D, Stromberg MP, et al: A comprehensive map of mobile element insertion polymorphisms in humans, PLo S Genet 7:e1002236, 2011.
Sun JX, Helgason A, Masson G, et al: A direct characterization of human mutation based on microsatellites, Nature Genet 44:1161– 1165, 2012.Sun JX, Helgason A, Masson G, et al: A direct characterization of human mutation based on microsatellites, Nature Genet 44:1161–1165, 2012.